Implicit permissions
The backend trusts the request.
A simple ID change is enough.
Someone may already be able to read data that does not belong to them. Without breaking anything.
Check before someone else does.
Audits run on SaaS, fintech and marketplace APIs.
Max 3 audits / week
Next slot: May 12
The problem
In most cases, nothing is “broken”. The API responds. Routes work.
That is exactly the problem.
Attackers do not exploit bugs. They exploit what you allowed through.
And in most cases, it’s already there. In production.
Probably yours.
Here’s what it looks like in practice:
The backend trusts the request.
A simple ID change is enough.
The API returns more than needed: roles, emails, internal flags.
That data becomes exploitable.
A missing condition. A client-side check.
The logic can be bypassed.
The method
The application is tested like an attacker would. Not to verify it “works”. To see how it can be used against you, concretely.
What an attacker can do immediately
What makes this possible
Already found in production. Probably yours too.
What we find in production
Even when everything “works”.
Here’s what’s already in production:
Impact
Every finding maps to a real access on your API.
No assumption. No false positive.
These vulnerabilities already exist in most APIs. In production, today.
Invoices, profiles or documents from other customers readable.
Internal routes reachable without access control — access to data or actions outside your API’s intended scope.
Account access via reusable or forged token.
Admin access reachable from a standard account.
Deleted data still accessible through the API.
Backend accepts invalid or manipulated data.
Files accepted without sufficient control. Execution or storage abuse possible.
Internal paths, IDs or backend logic exposed.
The most common ones. Not the most severe.
Audit report extract
Every flaw is reproduced with exploitable proof, directly on your API.
No interpretation. No doubt.
You know what to fix.
Concrete proof. Not guesswork.
An actionable report. Not a PDF nobody opens.
Unauthorized access to customer data. Legal risk and loss of trust.
Changing an ID in an authenticated request.
Reproduced request → access to another account’s data confirmed.
Strict server-side check + authorization test.
Immediate fix required
Real finding from an audit
A logged-in user. One modified request. Access to another customer’s data.
No error. Valid response. Data exposed.
GET /api/invoices/INV-2846 HTTP/1.1Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGci...// INV-2846 belongs to another account
HTTP/1.1 200 OK{ "id": "INV-2846", "customer": "alice@other-account.com", "amount": 4800, "status": "paid", "items": [...]}
/api/invoices/:id
Accès non autorisé aux données
Any authenticated user can access another customer’s data.
Strict server-side access check.
This is the type of flaw we identify in 72h.
This is not hypothetical. It is already exploitable.
That is enough. And it ships to production.
What you get in 72h:
Max 3 audits / week
Limited slots
Payment → access form → audit launched within 2 business hours.
FAQ
Your developers build. We test what your API lets through.
What works is not necessarily secure. In fact, it’s often the opposite.
Yes. Vulnerabilities exist as soon as the first endpoint is exposed.
A few exposed accounts is enough to create a customer, legal or commercial issue.
The code audit is specialized in TypeScript / Node / React.
API analysis (exposure, permissions, data) applies to any stack.
You receive a clear plan: impact, proof, fix.
Fixes can then be handled.
But you already know what to fix.
Because these vulnerabilities already exist.
The only question: when they will be exploited.
Very little. Repo access + an API URL is enough to get started.
No long team mobilization required.
Vulnerabilities don’t warn you.
They ship to production.
You have your answer.
The only question: what is your API letting through right now?
Audit started immediately.
Actionable results in 72h.
Without blocking your team.